 |
Get your band on the next mp3 comp CD! Click here for more info. Click here to join the Street Teams.
Sterolab
 Sterolab
Interview with Laetitia Sadier (Lead Vocalist)
by Nik Rainey
They're critical faves, microcosmic superstars, and bearers of
the used flag of neo-retrodelia, and yet Stereolab remains miraculously untouched by self-aggrandizement and pretension.
Case in point: having snagged half-an-hour of in-person one-on-one
time with the Anglo-Gallic band's main vocalist, Laetitia Sadier,
hours before a sold-out show in support of their latest album,Dots and Loops (Elektra), at Boston's Paradise club (less than a week before
a couple of New England Patriots' adventures in stagediving at,
of all things, an Everclear show, led to lawsuits and forced the
club to shut down for a month), Sadier, in open defiance of the
conventional wisdom about both rock stars and French people, was
unprepossessingly sweet-natured and even warm, quite in line with
the odd but cheerful constructions for which her band is increasingly
renowned. Let's go to the tape:
The odd thing about Dots and Loops is that a lot of critics have
been describing it as your most accessible album, and yet to my
ears, at least, it's probably one of the loosest in terms of song
structure. What are your thoughts on that?
I personally don't think that it's a very accessible album, especially
for the first-time listener. It won't appeal to you on a first-listen
basis, it's something you need to listen to actively. It's very
detailed, you know, intricate. Many layers. I don't want to say
"deep" (laughs) but there's a lot going on in it. The only reason I can think
of why some people say this is that it's our ninth album, and
certain people might be used to us by now. We ask a little bit
more of our listeners than most pop bands do, so maybe they did
the work with our previous records, assimilated it, and now they
can say they get it. I think Emperor Tomato Ketchup was a little bit more outreaching on our behalf, and now the
people have to come a little way on this one. But maybe they know
which way to go.
What inspired you to make the record sound this way? Obviously,
having members of Tortoise and Mouse on Mars involved affected
the way it came out, but was it conscious on your part?
Certainly, John (McEntire) was a big influence on the way the
record sounded, the way the drums were treated, the way the instruments
were recorded and so on... Personally, Tim and I have been listening
to a lot of soundtrack music, Ennio Morricone and things like
that, which gave us the idea to make the album a little more cinematic,
bringing some ideas to the listener without them thinking, "oh,
this is some pop album with some weird noises on it." Morricone
would often do some very experimental things in his soundtracks,
but because of the context of the film, people would accept them
and even think they were good, where they would never listen to
them outside of the movie theater. So Tim tried to recreate that
context in the pop format, have some strange ideas come across
in a way that people would accept.
In the past, the press seemed to like approaching you from rather
simplistic angles - "they're Marxist," "they're a revival act,"
"they're a Marxist revival act," etc. Has that changed noticably
now that you're a little better-known?
I don't know. I doubt it - the press takes a narrow view because
it's easier for them. Much of the time, they already have the
article written when they come in to talk to you, or at least
they know what angle they are going to use, and they'll remove
other things that you say that don't fit in to that, even though
people would be interested to read about it. When I read the press,
I like to find things that are going to open my mind a little
bit, make me see the world differently somehow. Some of Beck's
interviews do that, but I can't think of many others that do.
So I don't read the press anymore, I just let them say what they
will - I can't control it, so I do my interviews and hope that
something I say comes out the way I meant it. When I do read something,
it'll often be like that piece about us in Details - that made me so mad. That guy was with us for three days, he
rode on the bus with us, we talked to him about politics and philosophy
and many things, and all he could write about was the carrot mustache
Tim got after drinking a glass of carrot juice. It's infuriating.
It's kind of a low expectation thing, and it sucks, because when
you think about it, not many people have this outlet, this opportunity
to say something and have people hear it. I do think it's an important
part of what we do, although I don't like doing interviews for
eight hours at a time like they make us do sometimes - after three
hours of talking, you end up talking spaghettis.
Spaghettis?
Yeah, you're talking and these spaghettis start coming out of
your mouth (makes spiral shape with finger) and you can't control it.
Let's hope that comes across in print... Your rise to prominence
has coincided with a wider interest in new and diverse musics.
I've noticed in the last year particularly that there have been
some marvelous, unique bands out there that don't fit into any
unified pop movement, and yet have affected the way popular music
has been listened to. It seems to me that Stereolab helped kick-start
that in a way.
These are phenomenons that I really like, actually - when someone
in Tokyo, someone in France, someone in London, and someone in
America is getting influenced by the same things at the same time
and doing something about it. They might not be aware of the others,
but it's still a collective thing, which is how movements begin.
We have participated in some of these movements, or at least come
along at the same time as them - elevator music, easy-listening
- and all that just happens to be a part of what we do, but only
a part. But a band like Throbbing Gristle, who can't be called
easy-listening (laughs), were trading on some of that kind of imagery back in 1977. And
there are bands now that have those elements, yet never heard
Throbbing Gristle. So it comes from somewhere.
You really seem to let the music do the talking on stage. You
don't bother with trading on your personal charisma to get the
audience's attention or erect a persona that might enhance or
distract from the music.
I think we're too sincere for that, though I understand why some
people do. Sometimes, it feels like I'm just lying there onstage,
and I think, "Fucking hell, where's that persona I was supposed
to come up with years ago?" It would have been easier if I had
re-created myself years ago and have something I could count on
in public. Also, in the realm of creation, you can pour anything
you want into it. Elvis did it, PJ Harvey is doing it, even Björk
- they understood what it means, the psychology of being on stage.
But we're there for different reasons; I'd rather people had control
of their lives and not expect the star on stage to live their
life for them. There's the whole idea of autonomy, for people
to take what they want to take, participate, give, or whatever
- we don't suck it out of the public, like "look at meeee!" They
come to us, yes, but we come to them as well without being patronizing
- saying "heyyy, howyuhdoin'?" and saying the same lines every
night. The idea is that it circulates - a show is a success when
they have given something to it, just as we have, and it creates
something greater than either us or them. It changes you chemically,
and puts you on some other level.
Maybe that's what keeps you so exciting while certain other bands
that use the same elements as you are already outdated. You're
not pretentious or condescending about it.
One of the things that Tim taught me was, "if you have a good
idea, do it now. Don't wait." Don't be afraid of using it up.
Use your idea, and be confident that tomorrow, another good one
will come along. And if you fail, so what? You try again. I guess
that's why so many people like us - it's good ideas, done well,
without all this seductive production or putting sexy ladies on
the cover or manipulating people like that. It's just there.
Great. Any message you want to leave the kids with before you
go?
Umm... just learn how to think using your own set of reasons.
That's a good answer. I ask other people that question and I get
answers like, "play more baseball."
Oh! Well, you can do that, too. At the same time, even.
|